Set apart parochialism for harmony, unity and integrity
Despite 54 years of Malaysia since 1963, we are still very
much parochial in the way we manage our politics and its impact on the society
at large.
Malaya started with the Alliance of major political parties
UMNO, MCA and MIC to gain support of the people to manage the nation then.
Post 1969, Alliance was slowly expanded with several more
political parties to be known as Barisan Nasional or National Front or simply
known as BN. BN now has 14 political
parties plus other associated NGOs to master greater support to ensure BN stays
in power even with questioned tactics in politics.
Maybe we see more of BN at every General elections since
1970s.
Every candidate in the BN come from various parties in BN and
the common platform or logo as approved by the Register of Society and the
Election Commission Malaysia of BN is the “dacing” sign.
Under that strategy is the networking of all the component
parties, but what is important is the platform of BN.
So all candidates especially those made themselves into the
various seats and the Cabinet positions should only be identified as BN member
and not any other political parties which should be kept at home.
Is it a departure from the national policy that some consider
their own political parties as more important or prominent than BN as a
registered and recognised group forward?
The names of those component parties never feature in the
crucial ballot papers. Soon after the
conclusion of the General Elections, the winners harp on their own political
parties in public forum.
So how can we pursue the national policy of national unity,
national harmony, common identity, and possible integration when parties within
BN can be off tangent?
We read such material daily in the public forum and how can
we move forward as a united nation?
Just an example to illustrate the point as it was reported
that “Teo is certainly the best performing Chinese
minister in the State Cabinet,” Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) deputy president
Datuk Chin Su Phin.
Without prejudice, I believe all
component parties in BN think and act in that manner pitting someone against
others in the same family of BN.
Can such thinking do so much
damage to the young nation still behaving like “babies” as it can be deemed to
be “seditious” as well?
I hope this is good food for
thought and that BN – the socalled ruling authority- would address this anomaly
to cement better relationship amongst the matured leaders so that all people
would be benefited as any division or divided society would finally cause the
collapse of the house we all intend to build but likely seen as lips service
only. It seems BN has failed even after
a few decades.
Lets get out of the scenario
mired with “ill will concept” to steer the nation on higher ground.
Joshua Y. C. Kong 5/9/2017
No comments:
Post a Comment