Trend of New Malaysia and consequences thereof

Trend of New Malaysia and consequences thereof

If we watch You Tube items on USA, we always see a strange trend of all things undesirable such as fake news, distorted matters, questioned materials, dubious errors, misleading data, endless diatribe of all sorts arguable facts and falsehood.

Would such trend be desirable in New Malaysia even for the new PH Government in Malaysia and Warisan Government in Sabah?

We really do not know what is heading forward on Malaysia Agreement 1963 when it is already well established for more than 50 years and yet we are still at talking stage especially with new committee to review the MA63.  How valid is such deliberation when it is a constitutional matter and yet nobody bothers to bring it to the epic Court?  Any campaign that appears in the mass media and social media would just be “buying” time and confusion that can lead to nowhere as so much had gone under the  bridge especially in the recent years of the previous long standing BN Government?  This MA63 has nothing to do with any Government and should have been implemented since 1963.  So why are we still be misled by all sorts of questioned drama?  If this is pursued with hidden agenda, then Sabah and Sarawak being the losers would be losers forever with or without any compensatory possibilities despite a New Malaysia.  Would this mean New Malaysia would be without the two Borneo’s states? Did the PM Tun Mahathir in his recent visit to Brunei touch on the MA63 as Brunei opted out then?

Similar with another constitutional matter of 40% revenue due to the Borneo states which has also gone through a long process but not likely a settlement because of the relevant records for decades are not maintained.  Can we go for a reasonable figure of say RM100 b in a state sovereign fund?

RCI on illegal immigrants Sabah (RCI IIS) has sort of disappeared from the radar of New Malaysia except the returned PM had justified Project IC for holders now bordering 2 millions after a few decades and the Deputy Chief Minister Sabah Datuk Wilfred Tangau lodging a Police Report against the Warisan Government in a related matter? So is RCI IIS after so much hype since 2012-2014 fully “buried” by the previous Government and with a sentimental reminding “ceremony” of fresh issues on the same issues? Are Sabahans destined to be swarmed by illegal foreigners especially Sungai Sibuga was loaded with big volume of Project IC holders making it the biggest electoral seat in Sabah?  Is the light in the tunnel of RCIIIS totally blackout now?  Would a RCI to review RCI IIS (2012) be conducted very soon to deter a relapse of mal-administration?

It is quite a surprise that a long serving Chairman/Secretary of Election Commission Malaysia has been appointed as Chairman of Electoral Reform Committee (ERC).  What is the point of ERC when there was the Parliamentary Select Committee in 2011 that appears to have gone “silent” and yet   electoral frauds have been rampant when ECM has manipulated the statutory prescribed Form 16 of Election Regulation 27 of Elections (conduct of elections) Regulations 1981?  I must emphasize that this ERC must not amend the Form 16 to perpetrate the rampant electoral frauds that certainly done very much consequential damages to the nation with continued illegal Government.  What is the programme of ERC so far?  Is there to be any public forums or town hall events where concerned knowledgeable people can lodge their views?

Petronas is still sticking out.  How much have Sabah lost out to Petronas since 1974 ?  We were given in return a pittance of 5% and now for sometimes some including the new Warisan Government expects something like 20% of what –profit or gross revenue? I doubt Petronas would be sincere either methods as since when Sabah has separate accounts in Malaysia?  I believe based on some media reports that Petronas through Petronas Carigali (PC) gets 20% share of the Production Sharing Contract (PSC) while it is revealed by a former state minister that PC only gets 5% in such PSC deals. (DE page 2 August 14, 2018). We will wait for the National budget 2019 which will show how much Sabah would get its annual fiscal allocation.  Whatever we get from Petronas would be adjusted in the national budget. So would Sabah be the loser again and again? Can Sabah get back 100% of our oil and gas resources?

About this Water dilemma  in Sabah, it was reported under the heading “ Review thoroughly water concession agreement : Jamawi” DE p 2 August 14, 2018 which stated at the State Assembly as “The department is among those given high allocations, which is RM164,225,584 million, in the Bill tabled earlier.”  What a fantastic figure (15 digits) in RM164 Trillions?  I hope this is not reported in the Hanzard to mislead the records.

The Watergate has a special record in the new Parliament where certain MACC cases on the corruption charges were “cleared” in Parliament, and is it an unusual development? 

Another later development titled “Water Dept revamp to save RM1b” which would be a great expectation?  Is it an one- off case and not an annual affairs?  Congratulations if this can be achieved.

I have written a book “water” in 2005 where I analysed the Non Revenue Water (NRW) as more than 80% not what we are told as much lesser than that. The water department losses including massive corruption as norm is nothing new.

About Cabotage (once held in secrecy) since 1980, we have yet to feel any decline in cost of living although it is reported that cabotage is now done with.  Any usual updates on cabotage-less impact in the economy?

“Tourism not really benefiting local “ DE p3, September 7, 2018 should be the appropriate writing on the wall for Sabah as Tan Sri Simon Sipaun now newly installed Chairman of IDS should tell us as which industries in Sabah have actually really benefitted local realistically?  As it is known our major items like fossil oil and gas, palm oil and others including jobs opportunities have bled Sabah beyond recognition for decades.  I hope IDS would come out with a comprehensive research paper for corrective measures to render local people the maximum returns in all economic sectors. It is very urgent otherwise it is sun set for all the local.  There are lots of frontiers to be addressed head on like ecology, consumerism and environmentalism to enable good future for all or we perish soon especially with worsening climate change.  I would suggest we initiate an urgent and serious Coalition of NGOs in EcoGeneration to address our existence in ecology, consumerism and environment.

National debts figure is still uncertain even with the alleged over a trillion Ringgit when the debts clock shows RM 722 billion.   I believe it is much over a Trillion Ringgit and this issue deserves a comprehensive investigation.  The other side of the crisis is how it would impact the annual fiscal budget and repayment in the foreseeable future?  Who should be held responsible for such critical adverse development affecting Malaysia?  We are also unsure how 1MDB is exploding?

We cannot provide lips service any more including “fake” concept but trendy positive actions for a whole range of pressing issues (the above is not exhaustive) to save NEW Malaysia, to save the earth and our existence on earth until the next phase of our lives.

Joshua Y C Kong 11/9/2018