Hope NACP is as
good in action and not on paper only
The
newly-launched National Anti-Corruption Plan (NACP) 2019-2023 on 29
January,2019 serves as a warning to all – including the prime minister and
Cabinet ministers – to steer clear of graft.
The
NACP also reveals that RM1.8 trillion was lost by the government through
illicit financial flows between 2005 and 2014.
The
prime minister said that the execution of the 115 initiatives in the NACP,
which aim to rid Malaysia of corruption, will need the involvement of all –
from himself to kindergarten teachers.
“(You)
cannot expect me alone to do it, or only the National Governance, Integrity and
Anti-Corruption Centre (GIACC).
“And,
it is also not the responsibility of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission
(MACC) or certain agencies, to shoulder the responsibility of (ensuring
corruption-free) governance and integrity.
“It
is the responsibility of all quarters… to inculcate good values and to (instil)
hatred towards corruption among our children.
The
Federal Court on 30th January, 2019 cautioned that those who
disclose their police reports to the public may face the risk of civil action
against them in court.
Justice
Azahar Mohamed, who read the judgment in a case involving defamation, said
people who disclosed the contents of their police reports to the public did not
enjoy the right of absolute privilege.
Absolute
privilege is an immunity for individuals, especially elected representatives,
who make statements within the legislature regardless of whether their statements
are malicious or not.
Azahar said the legal position in Malaysia was that a person making a police
report was immune from legal action against him or her.
“However,
we do not see a reason, on grounds of public policy, that the complainant
should be free from accountability by way of defamation when publishing their
statement to the public.
“There
is no sufficient basis or necessity to expand the ambit of absolute privilege
to cover the subsequent publication of the report at large,” the judge said in
delivering judgment in the defamation case against local actress Zahida Rafik.
With
this latest ruling from the Federal Court unless clarified by the Government of
the day that we cannot be whistle blowers unless we are protected in the fight
against corruption.
The
Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 passed by Parliament in June 2010 provides
protection to whistleblowers who voluntarily come forward to report or reveal
information on corruption activities. This Act also encourages the public from
all sectors to disclose corruption related activities. The identity of the
whistleblower and the information provided are kept confidential from any
party. Whistleblowers are also given immunity from any civil, criminal or
disciplinary action due to the revealing of the act of corruption.
The
Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 is a law of Malaysia to combat corruption and
other wrong doings by encouraging and facilitating disclosures of improper
conduct in the public and private sector, to protect persons making those
disclosures from detrimental action, to provide for the matter disclosed to be
investigated and dealt with and to provide for the remedies connected
therewith.
Whistleblower
Andre Xavier Justo on 1st February, 2019, who is credited with breaking
the infamous 1MDB scandal in Malaysia, has been gifted US$2 million (RM8.2
million) by The Edge Media Group chairman for exposing the scam
Group
chairman Tong Kooi Ong presented the gift to Justo when he, his wife Laura and
four-year-old son Zander visited the business weekly’s office today. They met
Tong and the group’s CEO, Ho Kay Tat, The Edge Markets reported.
“The
gift to Justo is in appreciation of his contribution to Malaysia in helping to
expose the kleptocracy of the past government,” Tong was quoted as saying in
the report.
“Without
him, the wrongdoings involving 1MDB, as exposed by The Edge, would not have
come to light.”
Justo
was arrested in 2015 for leaking documents from oil and gas company PetroSaudi
International relating to its joint venture with 1MDB, which formed the basis
of a money laundering investigation.
This
landed him in a Thai jail for 18 months for allegedly demanding payment in
exchange for not disclosing confidential information.
“His
family was harassed and intimidated while he was languishing in jail. No one
should have to go through what he had to endure for helping to reveal the
truth,” Tong said.
So
we can see that it is not that easy for any whistleblower without pain and no
gain. So Justo at least can see the day of his struggle against the
Kleptocratic government under Najib.
So
what the Federal Court decision on 30th January, 2019 can present a
harder fight against corruption especially against a kleptocratic government even
with today’s new Government should NACP would likely fail too.
The
role of newspapers in the fight against corruption could also be facing tougher
challenge as corrupted deals could simply be swept under the carpets as with my
experience of exposing the corruption in the Government sector since 2004 in
more than 30 Police Reports worth more than RM30 trillions –past present and
future losses arising from corruption.
Newspapers
would welcome Police Reports for publication to stir public concern.
When
the Police fails to act on any corruption matters, the Police would recommend the
lodgers of Police Reports to go to MACC for further action. But when MACC also
fail to act where would the lodgers go?
Go to Public Complaint Bureau and then to Malaysia Human Right
Commission or Suhakam. When all things
fail to see any correction action, it is naturally that such Police Reports are
published in online websites and or blogs just to draw more attention without
fear and favour.
Now
with the “new Malaysia” government, are the aggrieved public got any way better
to deal with corruption of a “kleptocratic” government or certain politicians
and civil servants now they are sort of protected
with the latest ruling from the Federal Court despite NACP and the
Whistleblowers Act 2010?
Now
this letter is to the Court of the People in the fight of kleptocracy. Imagine RM1.8 trillions was lost for the
period 2005 to 2014 (only tip of iceberg). You are sure ill practice would not be
repeated when politicians often claim that they spent a lot on money to bribe
the voters?
For
NACP to succeed, it is obvious the public contribution is pertinent and the
Federal Court or the legal fraternity assure the public that Whistleblowers Act
2010 is still relevant.
To
have an added punch in fight against kleptocracy, the whistle blowers should be
rewarded after a long battle like what Justo has just being rewarded to go on
living.
For
myself not to be disappointed forever in my effort of more than 30 Police
Reports mostly published in blogspot, should not I be similarly rewarded like
Justo to bring greater justice in society?
In
passing, I am just wondering if there is really any justice from the Courts of
Malaysia when we have the expensive and beautiful domes on top of major court
buildings or complexes and symbolic of what, may I ask?
There
is another Act on cruelty against animals especially dogs, and yet no official punitive
action initiated against the often crimes against dogs as recently witnessed a horrendous
slaughter of a dog by an employee in a steel factory and apologised by the company
concerned. Why such exposure escapes the
attention and action of the relevant authorities?
Also
is it not an abuse of court to be punished accordingly for withdrawing a very
high profile court case in London by a top opposition leader for a massive
claim in great disgrace when he could not recite what he had said in Malaysia
in the London court that “It is not a sin of corruption in Islam” as per
Rewcastle-Brown. Why should not Malaysia
deliver such natural justice when there appears to be dual systems of conflict
but it is done elsewhere?
I
must thank God if this letter in full would be published by Daily Express as
real justice would prevail in exposing all ills and corruption especially
kleptocracy.
Joshua
Y C Kong, 7/2/2019
No comments:
Post a Comment