Tuesday, January 23, 2018

Make Sabah more exciting the Sabah way.



Make Sabah more exciting the Sabah way.

It is indeed very exciting for Sabah Chief Minister Tan Sri DSP Musa Aman to mention that Sabah can match Singapore and Dubai and he went on to say that the State Government wants Sabah to be on a par with Singapore and Dubai through the implementation of several transformation programmes, including Tanjung Aru Eco Development (TAED).

Chief Minister Tan Sri Musa Aman said the development of TAED would beautify and further transform the image of Kota Kinabalu as the capital of Sabah through the construction of International standard hotels and various facilities.
Whether TAED can really kick off or not, a lot of other factors should be properly considered and it is indeed a surprise that CM has singled out TAED as a reference here.
Looking at a broader context, how can Sabah match Singapore and Dubai given all the known parameters of these three places?
The statistics are for all to see.
For Dubai, it is the largest and most populous city in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).[
According to the census conducted by the Statistics Centre of Dubai, the population of the emirate was 1,771,000 as of 2009, which included 1,370,000 males and 401,000 females.
As of June 2017, the population is 2,789,000. The region covers 1,287.5 square kilometres (497.1 sq mi).
One of the world's fastest growing economies, Dubai's gross domestic product is projected at US$107.1 billion, with a growth rate of 6.1% in 2014.
For Singapore since independence, extensive land reclamation has increased its total size by 23% to 130 square kilometres (50 sq mi) with about 6 million inhabitants. Singapore’s GDP is about USD400 billions.
The total land area of Sabah is nearly 73,904 square kilometres (28,534 sq mi) with about 4m people including illegal and dubious citizens. The GDP of comparative huge Sabah in size of the three areas is less than RM63 billion.
Even with TAED’s expected revenue of RM30b (one time and not annually), it is nowhere near the other two areas Singapore and Dubai.
So why should we chase up with the other two areas?  Why don’t we do our own things for our own sustainable and environmental friendly development in Sabah without competing with the hall marks of the other two areas?
Having said that I would like to suggest that the Government declare and create a Cooperative zone in islands as a new frontier for expedited development the Sabah way.
There are about 400 islands in Sabah some big and many small ones, and once co-operatised, some islands could be grouped together in cluster for economic scale for better performance.
This is an unknown frontier but islands are attractive places to be in and worth to be explored to the full as some major islands like Labuan, Sipidan, Ligitan, Mataking, Pulau Tiga (Kuala Penyu), Pulau Tiga (Kudat), Banggi, and many others for economic contribution in a scale never seen before.
Such purposes like tourism, farming/fishing, health resorts, security, for maximum utilised by a local new urban population to fully develop them with good environment in an appropriate low tax system with all the desired trading facilities are fully justified.
All the islands would be co-ordinated by all advanced communication tools and travel links by a few shipping lines thus powered by renewal energy sources like solar panels, wind and waves around the cluster of islands.  With adequate supply of clean energy, clean water would not be a problem as desalination process could be put in place.
All the operators in the islands would be cooperatives. To attract investors, GST in these islands would be zero like it is in Labuan.  Cooperatives are very prominent elsewhere in the world.
Then we would need new electricity set up.  This is justified in view of the sad story of SESB.

The story of the electricity supplier for decades has been too much to be desired largely with unsustainable losses for decades and so much so that TNB has to come in to boost up the latest company SESB.  The end of SESB is sadly and unfortunately must be a reality so that a new set up with new modus operandi to take over the monopoly so far granted to SESB.  Even with a monopolistic body, it cannot be sustained, and many questions cannot be dealt with to resolve the many woes attached to SESB.

So apart from the fossil fuel as major source for the generation of electricity while hydro power is likely dwindling due to environmental damages as irreversible, it is timely that technology is now available for various renewable energy sources like solar panel, wind, waves, biomass and still available hydropower to be fully exploited in Sabah surrounded by seas. All major towns and urban areas are at the coastline, when waves and wind can be 24/7 while solar (limited hours of sun), biomass, and hydro sources are obvious limited naturally.

With the exploitation of new renewable sources, our energy costs could be low and regular black outs are history.  The co-op movement should be awarded this role of supplying and distribution of electricity to boost economy in the state especially the industrial sector which demands cheap and reliable energy.

Obviously Sabah with a very big hinterland would need tremendous fund to implement first class basic infrastructure and communication facilities to bring about enhanced economy growth the Sabah way.  Unless such fund is forthcoming, how would we match up with Dubai and Singapore?

Joshua Y C Kong 24/1/2018

Complaints about and around Kota Kinabalu



Complaints about and around Kota Kinabalu

We know that Central Business District (CBD) and the outlying areas had been developed in greater pace in the past decades since Kota Kinabalu has become a City.
There may be some upsides and also downsides with some very ugly instances.
It is appreciative of the upsides on the face of it with a few fairly big shopping malls but there are still various eyesores in the city with some abandoned projects for years.
We also know that it is indisputable that the most popular shopping malls are KK Times Square especially with the portion of Imago most exciting part in KK City as the heavy traffic jams in many hours daily in the area.
Does the KK Times Square especially Imago provide the good image of the city when the very busy access road is very rocky in the shortest road in city leading to two biggest carparks in the city. How would those paying for the expensive parking fee in KK Times Square and with their supposedly posh offices feel when the single access road (no other choice) is most unpleasant? 
The rocky road can damage the vehicles and cause more traffic jam unnecessarily with the very slow pace going over the rocky road.  Do we want tourists and locals alike to remember this adverse/unpleasant scenario in the city for this shortest road in a premier locality?
Can we imagine a superb office girl wearing 3/ 4 inches high heel shoes fall over hurting herself in the process in crossing the rocky/holey road and tearing her posh clothing, what would happen then?  Would she sue for that disaster?
I had an incidence where my car’s shock absorber just broke in pot hole in the east London street and after lodging a complaint with the local council and site visit, and in spite the hole was sealed, the council asked no question but fully paid up for the repair bill.
Just a few days, a friend of mine damaged his car badly avoiding a pot hole at a roundabout near Tuaran in the dark where there was no street light. Is this a good image of Sabah?
There are also many –actually countless- unsightly places in the city.  Just to mention two items I would like to say that the back streets behind the most posh building Shell Plaza is always flooded with thrash made worst with rain and Jalan Pantai side road with holes of thrash and black water.  Do we really want the tourists bring home such images when diners sit for the Bak Kut Teh dinner in the pavement by the road?
I hope we can see a more liveable city in KK now and not another few years to come.
Joshua Y C Kong 23/1/2018