Questions on TAED to destroy Tanjung Aru Beach – a natural zone.

Questions on TAED to destroy Tanjung Aru Beach – a natural zone.

There appears to be much misrepresentation on Tanjung Aru Eco Development (TAED) on Tanjung Aru Beach since launched on 16 September, 2013 co-incidentally the golden jubilee of Malaysia.

So there are many questions that need answers why TAED must be stopped.

1.       Was there a grand design that TAED has arrived with massive artificial reclamation and expansion? 

2.       Why suddenly got massive fund like RM5b for TAED?

3.        What is the source of that massive fund?

4.       New Town ship as in extension of Tanjung Aru town be ecological?  

5.       Was the misrepresentation of criminal in nature to further destruction of the God’s natural aesthetic beach for the souls?

6.       Is it to be ecological project in TAED when it is more like for economy?

7.       Is the commercial golf course really a green project?

8.       Beach 1, Beach 2 and Beach 3 of TAB are largely state land and who then own it in TAED? 

9.       Unless a White paper is done, can the state land deals be questioned for land grab?

10.   Can we approach MACC to examine how TAED with the conversion of land use was NOT an abuse of power when TAED has an insidious agenda for self gains?

11.    Is The questioned key player in an elderly person in a State body gives the ground for an abuse of power for such an appointment as CEO?

12.    How can a new township as an extension of Tanjung Aru be ecological in purpose and substance?

13.   Could assets stripping be an element of cheating to buy low and sell high?

14.   Who make the profit for the prime land deals largely once state land?

15.   From ecological in its name Tanjung Aru Eco Development to economic prospectus is it not cheating in concept of the purpose?

16.   Has the Auditor-General conducted an annual audit on the performance of TAED – a state Agency in all the land deals?

17.   Why was First beach was already destroyed ahead of the final approval.

18.   Has full public interest being considered for a public zone?

The questions above  are Not exhaustive and if no answers are forthcoming, then maybe a Court intervention be initiated to resolve saving the TAB in its present status.

Joshua Y C Kong  15/12/2016